|
THE
CURE OF IMPERFECT SIGHT BY
TREATMENT WITHOUT GLASSES
CHAPTER
21
SQUINT
AND AMBLYOPIA - THEIR CAUSE
Since
we have two eyes, it is obvious that in the act of sight two pictures
must be formed; and in order that these two-pictures shall be fused into
one by the mind, it is necessary that there shall be perfect harmony of
action between the two organs of vision. In looking at a distant object
the two visual axes must be parallel, and in looking at an object at a
less distance than infinity, which for practical purposes is less than
twenty feet, they must converge to exactly the same degree. The absence
of this harmony of action is known as squint, or strabismus and is one
of the most distressing of eye defects, not only because of the lowering
of vision involved, but because the want of symmetry in the most expressive
feature of the face which results from it has a most unpleasant effect
upon the personal appearance. The condition is one which has long baffled
ophthalmological science. While the theories as to its cause advanced
in the text-books seem to fit some cases, they leave others unexplained,
and all methods of treatment are admitted to be very uncertain in their
results.
The
idea that a lack of harmony in the movements of the eye is due to a corresponding
lack of harmony in the strength of the muscles that turn them in their
sockets seems such a natural one that this theory was almost universally
accepted at one time. Operations based upon it once had a great vogue;
but to-day they are advised, by most authorities, only as a last resort.
It is true that many persons have benefited by them; but at best the correction
of the squint is only approximate, and in many cases the condition has
been made worse, while a restoration of binocular vision - the power of
fusing the two visual images into one - is scarcely even hoped for.(1)
The
muscle theory fitted the facts so badly that when Donders advanced the
idea that squint was a condition growing out of refractive errors - hypermetropia
being held responsible for the production of convergent and myopia for
divergent squint - it was universally accepted. This theory, too, proved
unsatisfactory, and now medical opinion is divided between various theories.
Hansen-Grut attributed the condition, in the great majority of cases,
to a defect, not of the muscles, but of the nerve supply; and this idea
has had many supporters. Worth and his disciples lay stress on the lack
of a so-called fusion faculty, and have recommended the use of prisms,
or other measures, to develop it. Stevens believes that the anomaly results
from a wrong shape of the orbit, and as it is impossible to alter this
condition, advocates operations for the purpose of neutralizing its influence.

Fig.
53
No.
1. - Reading the Snellen test card with normal vision; visual axes parallel.
No.
2. - The same patient making an effort to see the test card; myopia and
convergent squint of the left eye have been produced.
In
order to make any of these theories appear consistent it is necessary
to explain away a great many troublesome facts. The uncertain result of
operations upon the eye muscles is sufficient to cast suspicion on the
theory that the condition is due to any abnormality of the muscles, and
many cases of marked paralysis of one or more muscles have been observed
in which there was no squint. Relief of paralysis, moreover, may not relieve
the squint, nor the relief of the squint the paralysis. Worth found so
many cases which were not benefited by training designed to improve the
fusion faculty that he recommended operations on the muscles in such cases;
while Donders, noting that the majority of hypermetropes did not squint,
was obliged to assume that hypermetropia did not cause this condition
without the aid of co-operating circumstances.
That
the state of the vision is not an important factor in the production of
squint is attested by a multitude of facts. It is true, as Donders observed,
that squint is usually associated with errors of refraction; but some
people squint with a very slight error of refraction. It is also true
that many persons with convergent squint have hypermetropia; but many
others have not. Some persons with convergent squint have myopia. A person
may also have convergent squint with one eye normal and one hypermetropic
or myopic, or with one eye blind. Usually the vision of the eye that turns
in is less than that of the eye which is straight; yet there are cases
in which the eye with the poorer vision is straight and the eye with the
better vision turned in. With two blind eyes, both eyes may be straight,
or one may turn in. With one good eye and one blind eye, both eyes may
be straight. The blinder the eye, as a rule, the more marked the squint;
but exceptions are frequent, and in rare cases an eye with nearly normal
vision may turn in persistently. A squint may disappear and return again,
while convergent squint will change into divergent squint and back again.
With the same error of refraction, one person will have squint and the
other not. A third will squint with a different eye. A fourth will squint
first with one eye and then with the other. In a fifth the amount of the
squint will vary. One will get well without glasses, or other treatment,
and another with these things. These cures may be temporary, or permanent,
and the relapses may occur either with or without glasses.
However
slight the error of refraction, the vision of many squinting eyes is inferior
to that of the straight eye, and for this condition, usually, no apparent
or sufficient cause can be found in the constitution of the eye. There
is a difference of opinion as to whether this curious defect of vision
is the result of the squint, or the squint the result of the defect of
vision; but the predominating opinion that it is, at least, aggravated
by the squint has been crystallized in the name given to the condition,
namely, amblyopia ex anopsia, literally dimsightedness from non-use -
for in order to avoid the annoyance of double vision the mind is believed
to suppress the image of the deviating eye. There are, however, many squinting
eyes without amblyopia, while such a condition has been found in eyes
that have never squinted.
The
literature of the subject is full of the impossibility of curing amblyopia,
and in popular writings persons having the care of children are urged
to have cases of squint treated early, so that the vision of the squinting
eye may not be lost. According to Worth, not much improvement can ordinarily
be obtained in amblyopic eyes after the age of six, while Fuchs says,(2)
"The function of the retina never again becomes perfectly normal,
even if the cause of the visual disturbance is done away with." Yet
it is well known, as the translator of Fuchs points out in an editorial
comment upon the above statement,(3) that if the sight of the good eye
is lost at any period of life, the vision of the amblyopic eye will often
become normal. Furthermore, an eye may be amblyopic at one time and not
at another. When the good eye is covered a squinting eye may be so amblyopic
that it can scarcely distinguish daylight from darkness; but when both
eyes are open, the vision of the squinting eye may be found to be as good
as that of the straight eye, if not better. In many cases, too, the amblyopia
will change from one eye to the other.
Double
vision occurs very seldom in squint, and when it does it often assumes
very curious forms. When the eyes turn in the image seen by the right
eye should, according to all the laws of optics, be to the right, and
the image seen by the left eye to the left. When the eyes turn out the
Opposite should be the case. But often the position of the images is reversed,
the image of the right eye in convergent squint being seen to the left
and that of the left eye to the right, while in divergent squint the opposite
is the case. This condition is known as paradoxical diplopia.. Furthermore,
persons with almost normal vision and both eyes perfectly straight may
have both kinds of double vision.
All
the theories heretofore suggested fail to explain the foregoing facts;
but it is a fact that in all cases of squint a strain can be demonstrated,
and that the relief of the strain is in all cases followed by the cure
of the squint, as well as of the amblyopia and the error of refraction.
It is also a fact that all persons with normal eyes can produce squint
by a strain to see. It is not a difficult thing to do, and many children
derive much amusement from the practice, while it gives their elders unnecessary
concern, for fear the temporary squint may become permanent. To produce
convergent squint is comparatively easy. Children usually do it by straining
to see the end of the nose. The production of divergent squint is more
difficulty, but with practice persons with normal eyes become able to
turn out either eye, or both, at will. They also become able to turn either
eye upward and inward, or upward and outward, at any desired angle. Any
kind of squint can, in fact, be produced at will by the appropriate kind
of strain. Some persons retain the power to produce voluntary squint more
or less permanently. Others quickly lose it if they do not keep in practice.
There is usually a lowering of the vision when voluntary squint is produced,
and accepted methods of measuring the strength of the muscles seem to
show deficiencies corresponding to the nature of the squint.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CITATIONS
1.
The result obtained by the operation is, as a rule, simply cosmetic. The
sight of the squinting eye is not influenced by the operation, and in
only a few instances is even binocular vision restored. - Fuchs: Text-Book
of Ophthalmology, p. 795.
The
result of even the most successful squint operation, in long-standing
strabismus, is merely cosmetic in the vast majority of cases. - Eversbusch:
The Diseases of Children, edited by Pfaunder and Schlossman. English translation
by Shaw and La Fetra, second edition, 1912-1914, vol. vii, p. 316.
2.
Text-Book of Ophthalmology, p. 633.
3.
Cases have been reported, some surely authentic, in which an amblyopic
squinting eye has acquired good vision, either through correction of the
refraction, or because loss of sight in the good eye has compelled the
use of the amblyopic eye. - Ibid.
|